Most peculiar, on my other computer all I got from cabbage was a blank
screen.  I thought he had joined the "less is more" crowd.  I long on a
different machine and find it's even better than that.  He actually provides
some interesting information.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Howard wrote: "I don't want to cut the bell on my N series 8D because
> the
> bell rings
> forever. I suspect cutting it would destroy that. I remember one day
> up in Boonsboro Walter Lawson was telling me how their bells ring
> better than others. He whacked my N series 8D's bell with his finger,
> and it probably still hasn't quit ringing. He was visibly shaken, and
> immediately stopped telling me about that aspect of his bells'
> superiority!"
>
> Dave W wrote
> I have always had enormous respect for Walter and his work, but this is
> one thing I could never understand.  What does a ringing bell flare
> mean?
> What does the old "thunk test" prove?  You could whack a steel mixing
> bowl
> and it work ring for a week.  But would that bowl make a good horn
> bell?  And,
> all other things being relatively equal, what would it tell you about a
> flare that rung and rung versus one that seemed dead when you whacked
> it?  You
> don't whack a horn to get the sound out.  You vibrate the air column.
> If a bell just kept ringing and ringing, would that not actually
> interfere
> with attacks, or with notes speaking, when playing runs?  And if not,
> why
> not?
>
> I'm sure that a certain amount of "ringing" is probably good for a bell
> flare to have, but isn't possible to have too much of a good thing?  I
> still haven't puzzled this out, and I sure would appreciate some
> enlightenment. No one I've talked with about this can give me a
> satisfactory
> explanation, and I'd love to have one.
> ************
> Cabbage says:
>
> Lawson did some studies of how horns sound with annealed and unannealed
> flares.  (These were published in the Journal of the Acoustical Society
> of America some while ago.)  An annealed flare is one which rings for a
> while when you strike it; unannealed flares generally will not.
>
> The article indicates that the tone quality for the two kinds of bells
> was most
> different at high dynamic levels.  The difference was a slight one: in
> the annealed
> flares, some of the higher frequency harmonics were enhanced by 3 dB or
> so.  The effect was
> different for yellow brass bells compared to nickel silver bells.
>
> If the flexibility of the wall material matters, then there are two
> influences it could have.   The first is that the walls could flex
> enough to produce
> audible sound.  The second is that the walls could flex enough to
> change the
> profile of the air column.
>
> I am aware of a study of metal organ pipes which demonstrated the
> following: if an organ pipe oscillates strongly enough to make audible
> sound from
> the surface, it will also change its profile enough to shift in
> frequency.
> This is not desirable, so organ manufacturers make organ pipes stiff
> enough to
> prevent it.
>
> How does this relate to the horn?  Here is some background.  When sound
> goes from your lips toward the bell, most of it reflects back to the
> lips.
> The low frequency parts tend to reflect in the narrow throat of the
> bell; the
> higher frequency parts of the sound reflect further out in the wider
> part of
> the bell. This means that the bell interacts most strongly with the
> high
> frequency harmonics in the sound.
>
> Some more background: as you play louder, the sound level of the
> harmonics
> increases.  However, the increase of the higher frequency harmonics is
> much greater than the increase of the low frequency harmonics.  (If you
> record a horn played quietly and play the recording with the volume
> knob up,
> it doesn't sound like a loud horn.)  So the relative spectrum shifts,
> enhancing
> the higher frequency harmonics.
>
> Most of the tubing of your horn is too thick and has too small a radius
> to oscillate very much.  The situation is different for the bell: it is
> much easier
> to bend the bell than (say) the surface of the leadpipe.
>
> So what happens when you play loudly?  The higher frequency parts of the
> sound become more significant.  Those are the parts of the sound that
> interact with the bell.  As they interact with the bell, the bell can
> oscillate
> and produce sound of its own.  I speculate that this sound from the
> bell can be audible and therefore contribute to the spectrum.  Unlike
> the
> organ pipe, however, the frequency of the horn will not change, since
> the playing frequency depends on how the low frequency parts of the
> sound interact with
> the narrow throat of the bell, which is not vibrating enough to change
> the
> profile of the instrument.
>
> Lawson studied the spectra of the sound produced by horns with annealed
> and unannealed flares.  But he did not determine how big the
> oscillations
> of the flares were, or whether those oscillations might produce audible
> sound.
>
> Some while ago, I participated in a blind test of a horn played with
> annealed
> and unnanealed flares.  (The flares had to be changed in a different
> room:
> it is easy to tell by the clanking noises whether someone is putting an
> annealed or unnanealed flare on a horn.)  I was able to distinguish the
> two kinds of bells.  The difference was slight, but apparent at loud
> dynamic levels, when the tone quality of the annealed flares was a
> little
> less blatty.  (I apologize for using such obscure scientific
> terminology.)
>
> Still, I think the ringing of the bell is quite a minor aspect of a
> horns sound.
> If you play a loud note, then stop abruptly, do you hear the bell
> ringing afterwards?
> Probably not.
>
> Gotta go,
> Cabbage
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> post: [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/bgross%40airmail.net
>
_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to