Hans will have the definitive answer in a while. M Bender <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello all, > >I am unfamiliar with this work. > >I'm playing 2nd horn for this concert, and, oddly, I've been given two 2nd >horn parts: one marked "horn in Do/C", and a second marked "horn in Fa/F". > >In my view, the second 2nd horn part marked "horn in Fa/F" goes quite high for >a 2nd horn, especially at mm. 105-106, and again at mm. 115-117; the other >part, marked "horn in Do/C" seems much more in the range of a 2nd horn part, >unless the composer intended the horn part to be played "horn in Do/C" alto >[up a perfect fifth], but this is not indicated on the part. > >I'm thinking that it would be more appropriate to play the "in Do/C" part >transposed down a perfect fourth, and the composer intended it to be played >this way. > >I'd be grateful if someone could clarify the performance requirement for this >work. > >Sincerely, >martin bender > > >"All great things are decided not by machines or gadgets, but by willpower; >whoever has it will finally prevail." Winston Churchill > > > > >_______________________________________________ >post: [email protected] >unsubscribe or set options at >https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/schmidhorninst%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ post: [email protected] unsubscribe or set options at https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org
