Hmm...  I googled this one and all I found was this link:

http://www.grahamnasby.com/misc/musicjoke_orchestral-math-test.shtml


I'll try Bing next time!


Francis

On 2 Jun 2011, at 19:51, Jeffrey S Barker wrote:

> OK, I'm ready to argue against my own post.  Steve Haflich is right to
> question the FFT I used in Audacity.  I did extend the length (8192), but
> this simply pads the windowed signal.  There are also various windowing
> methods (I used Hanning), all of which can cause some error in the
> spectrum.  Looking more carefully at my numbers (not repeated here), 5 cents
> difference in the lowest frequency (353 Hz) gives a difference of only 1 Hz,
> certainly within the error of my measurements.  Therefore I think we can
> conclude that I simply played the same note 5-10 cents flat the second
> time.  Steve Freides is also right that the higher harmonics are all lower
> for the farther note, but I don't see any systematic change other than that
> the overall volume was less farther away.
> 
> This morning I tried two other tests.  First I used the synthesized pitch
> from my tuner with the same experiment, measured 2 meters away and again
> about 8 meters away.  There were several overtones recorded in each case and
> both sets give exactly the same frequencies.  Next I played a middle C on an
> electronic keyboard using the midi "French Horn" setting (I'm biased).  I
> recorded the sound in the same room, then carried the recorder to the far
> end of the house, again about 8-9 meters away) and recorded the same note.
> Again the frequencies are exactly the same (within measurement error).  The
> amplitudes are smaller for the farther recording.  I'm not sure how to
> interpret the relative amplitudes.  Is the variation from 20-30 dB softer
> for the farther recordings enough for us to sense the pitch as flatter?
> 
> Here are the numbers:
> Middle C on electronic keyboard horn setting:
> 
>         Near                  Far
> 
> C4   262 Hz 7.2dB     262 Hz -10.2dB
> 
> C5   524 Hz 0.1dB     524 Hz -36.5dB
> 
> G5   785 Hz -24.3dB     785 Hz -43.2dB
> 
> C6   1047 Hz -24.1dB     1047 Hz -49.0dB
> 
> E6    1310 Hz -20.6dB      1309 Hz -46.3dB
> 
> G6   1571 Hz -33.0 dB     1570 Hz -64.6dB
> 
> A#6   1833 Hz -37.9dB     1833 Hz -65.2dB
> 
> C7   2094 Hz -40.6dB     2094 Hz -68.2dB (in noise)
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeffrey S. Barker
> Assoc. Prof. of Geophysics, Binghamton University
> Faculty Master, Dickinson Community
> (607) 777-2522 (Geology)  (607) 777-2826 (Dickinson)
> http://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~jbarker/
> _______________________________________________
> post: [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at 
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/solohorn%40mac.com

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to