These 3 D printers are in use for several companies, "printing" 
3D computer models into real 3D models or prototypes. I have
no knowledge how accurate these parts or models would be,
but I doubt, that technical parts can be produced for actual use.
The tolerances might be too much. And these machines are
just to produce prototypes to be shown at exhibitions, at model
shows, in conferences with potential customers or for the board
of directors before deciding to order masses of the product or to 
get them into production. 

As the pieces might not be as accurate as they should be (functional
pieces, spare parts, parts in general & not just single pieces for
decorative use), the after work would be costly, the production
also, so this process might not be designed for mass production.

Google a bit around inserting "3D printer" or "ProMetal" to get
more information.

I personally think, producing the parts for our instrument in the 
traditional way, but also using most up to date technology 
(computer command machines, precise tools, most precise half 
or full automated lathes) would be not just todays solution but also 
the technology of tomorrow & after tomorrow.

(comm.: we can notice the defects of mass produced & half automat
produced brass instruments - and we complain about.)

May I inform you, that I am working on a special valve for my horns,
where I can program both Strauss, all four Mozart & fragments & 
Leopold Mozart, the two Haydn, all Rosetti, Hindemith & Gliere & others), 
so I just have to turn this change valve or selector valve, to produce
all these concerts flawless with ease. The next step be another valve
(still have to find out where on the horn to place) for all the more or less 
important Symphonies & operas, leaving chamber music aside for the moment.

Pre orders for both valves must be accompanied by a bank endorsed
check, where I can insert the amount by myself. 
###############################################
Am 10.07.2011 um 15:28 schrieb Daniel Canarutto:

> On 10Jul 2011, at 9:45 , Hans Pizka wrote:
> 
>> Cloning a Strad atom by atom might be possible in theory...
> 
> I don't think it's really possible, Hans... unless William  
> demonstrates that ;-)
> By the way, I'm wondering: does William understand what an atom is? Or  
> is it all this just unsound blah-blah?
> 
> Daniel Canarutto
> mathematical physicist & dedicated amateur hornist
> http://www.dma.unifi.it/~canarutto/
> http://www.corno.it/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> post: [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at 
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to