--- Steve Freides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

You have all read Steve’s fine posting, so I won’t quote it.

It made me wonder, why I never really can remember the precise composition of 
the Napolitan chord.
So I found it on a web page, and then I knew why:

During my musicological studies, I have been quite a bit around jazz theory. 
And there the same
chord (Db in C major is not considered a subdominant, but a 
tritone-substitution for the dominant,
usually with the Db in the bass and with at least a minor seventh added.

The classical purpose of the Napolitan chord is to approach the Tonica in the 
melody line from a
semitone above via a semitone below (the leading note).

The jazz purpose is to approach the root in a chromatic way. The normal jazz 
cadenza in a
simplified version is ii7-V7-I. In C major giving the bass line D-G-C. The 
substitution version is
ii7-bII7-I giving the bass line of D-Db-C.

For me there is no split between the classical and the jazz approaches, as they 
are all about
creating a tension to be released on the Tonica.

This relates to a recent thread about Lacher, where Hans like the other posters 
excluded the
alleged horn obligato to be intended for horn. Hans suggested the 
zink/cornetto, which I
applauded. The Napolitan discussion took me back to the Lacher score, as I 
remembered a figure of
some soloist line notes with a sequence similar to that of a Napolitan cadenza. 
They were not true
Napolitan, rather sort of appogiaturas leading to the main note, which in casu 
was the third of
the subdominant.

This is all very subtle in a horn context, but it leads to the point of several 
posters including
me: horn players shall play their horn well, but they shall also be thorough 
musicians, which
includes knowledge of style and of harmony.

I only have played Mendelssohn’s violin concerto once at a reading. I was 2nd 
horn and another,
very good, but back then quite young, list member was first. Most of the way we 
played in natural
horn harmonies for horn in E, but suddenly we had to play one or more 
top-of-the-staff F’s in
unisono. Not an obvious range to meat within. But there is a clear reason 
behind the composer’s
writing. Which is that reason? Only to be told by those knowing about 
orchestral horn playing of
the period.

Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music2.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to