Ditto what Andrew said. Otherwise I'm on board with you Alex :)

Robert Banick | GIS Coordinator | International Services | Ì American Red 
Cross<http://www.redcross.org/>

From: Andrew Buck <andrew.r.b...@gmail.com<mailto:andrew.r.b...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, July 22, 2013 1:22 PM
To: Alex Barth <a...@mapbox.com<mailto:a...@mapbox.com>>
Cc: Robert Banick 
<robert.ban...@redcross.org<mailto:robert.ban...@redcross.org>>, Joseph Pollack 
<josephrichardpoll...@gmail.com<mailto:josephrichardpoll...@gmail.com>>, 
"hot@openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot@openstreetmap.org>" 
<hot@openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot@openstreetmap.org>>
Subject: Re: [HOT] UAVs

It is not the rendering and serving of the tiles that is the problem with the 
imagery processing, it is the orthorectification that is tricky.

UAV's are required to fly quite low which means that the individual frames are 
quite small, requiring tens or hundreds to cover even a small town.  At this 
scale it is not possible to manually orthorectify these images and more 
sophisticated techniques need to be applied.  This is the part of the solution 
that Robert was referring to.

-AndrewBuck
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to