I raised https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/718 focused only on the front page list/different purposes it serves. Ideas or examples of other 'task priority' UI encouraged.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Something that baffles me about the TM is that when a task is split, the > original tile seems to disappear from existence, even though people could > still have a reference to it, they will get a not found message and they > can't read the comments anymore. > > As a long time OSM contritbutor, I started doing validation work. I always > try to read the instructions, but I also find I'm jumping between tasks > quite often. It poses its own challenges... Anyway, I tend to prefer the > tasks where not every building needs to be mapped, but sometimes it's hard > to find the middle ground. In a tile where almost nothing is visible, I'd > try to map at least something like the rivers and the occasional footpath. > By mapping the rivers it becomes easier to find the 'roads' where they > cross the rivers. And the rivers are nice reference points by themselves as > well, of course. > > Polyglot > > 2015-12-06 17:58 GMT+01:00 Dale Kunce <dale.ku...@gmail.com>: > >> Ralf and John. >> I don't either of you are ranting but providing good feedback that aligns >> with my own thinking about tasks. I favor smaller tasks that can be >> completed quickly rather than huge tasks that take multiple mappers to >> complete. >> >> One thing that I think we are moving towards is a set of guidelines for >> TM PMs. This will standardize a lot of language and help keep tasks >> manageable. I'm working on a draft that I'll share with the HOT and TM PM >> lists once it's ready to share. >> >> Thanks as always for your time. >> >> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015, 11:35 AM Ralf Stephan <gtrw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The key for moving people from one-time to many-time contribution is >>> motivation. >>> I have seen volunteers suddenly much more motivated when I commented >>> with more >>> than a few words on a validation I did. But at least equally important >>> is task and tile size. >>> Large tasks are tackled more than a few times only by long-time >>> contributors. Why have >>> such big tasks when there is no hurry? I know I am more motivated if >>> tile sizes are small. >>> I'm sure it's more so with new contributors, so why have such large >>> tiles per default, if >>> they aren't completed anyway? Everything is made ever more casual, but I >>> need 30-60 >>> minutes to complete the smallest tile size to my satisfaction. Please >>> increase the split >>> count AND make the default tile size smaller, or you will never get >>> enough completed tiles by people who want to invest rather 15 than minutes. >>> >>> Sorry for ranting >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HOT mailing list >>> HOT@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> HOT@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot