The reason I joined this listserv was so that users could help each other with issues and problems they faced while helping to create maps for countries that don’t have the capabilities themselves. Out of the other listservs I am a part of, this one is by far the most troublesome, just like Milo said.
Since we are all individual HOT users and helpers with our own organizations that we represent, I agree that basic etiquette and common decency is necessary. However, I don’t believe a COC is automatically the answer. We are all just trying to help see projects get completed. There’s no need for internal bickering among volunteers. From: Milo van der Linden [mailto:m...@dogodigi.net] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 2:13 PM To: Dale Kunce Cc: osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org; Dan S; Mapa Nauta; hot@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [HOT] [Osmf-talk] [hotosm-membership] Re: Code of Conduct Reminder I feel almost all friction on this list, right now and in the past, has been between "those that want to organize" and those that do not want to be organized. The hot mailinglist is the only one in the openstreetmap lists I see this happen. Maybe somebody with a background in social behaviour could explain this phenomenon, why it occurs and how it can be resolved? On Dec 15, 2017 7:44 PM, "Dale Kunce" <dale.ku...@gmail.com<mailto:dale.ku...@gmail.com>> wrote: Just to clear the air. I misspoke in my initial post when I said the HOT CoC would be enforced on this list. I've since learned that the HOT list is not administered by HOT and thus our community crafted CoC does not apply here. Note: it does apply to all other HOT communication channels, including Tasking Manager, GitHub, slack, etc. As Mikel said the existing OSM Etiquette rules, however, do apply in this space. My earlier statement of asking all community members of this list to think twice about what you say on this list. This is not an effort to curb free speech but instead to build a positive collaborative space to discuss. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Russell Deffner <russell.deff...@hotosm.org<mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org>> wrote: Hi all, I would prefer to participate in mailing lists that are governed by CoC and enforced by an organized group rather than individuals. =Russ -----Original Message----- From: Dan S [mailto:danstowell+...@gmail.com<mailto:danstowell%2b...@gmail.com>] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 11:11 AM To: Rafael Avila Coya Cc: osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org>; Mapa Nauta; hot@openstreetmap.org<mailto:hot@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [HOT] [Osmf-talk] [hotosm-membership] Re: Code of Conduct Reminder Hi It does seem to me that more clarity would be good here, i.e. slightly disentangling the lines of accountability regarding the hot@ mailing list. Mikel's response has logical sense, but it's probably not clear to the average participant in the hot@ mailing list whether they are automatically made a part of the HOT community. Whether the best clarification is to have two mailing lists, or for the info page <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot> to make clear whether it is in general governed by HOT's rules, I don't know. Best Dan _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org<mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org<mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- sent from my mobile device Dale Kunce http://normalhabit.com _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org<mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
