For my show "20131004T082720Z 252 CPrompt-How-I-Found-Linux"  It can be
released Tue 2014-03-25: hpr1472.

Thanks!


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Carl D Hamann <carl.ham...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 09/03/14 16:55, Ken Fallon wrote:
> > I would like to bring this topic to some form of closure. Can I invite
> > everyone to comment on this proposed text.
> > <quote>
> > If you have a non urgent show, please consider scheduling it during the
> > summer period in the Northern Hemisphere as this is usually when we are
> > short of shows. The backup queue is intended only to be used in the
> > cases where there is still a gap in the schedule 24 hours prior to
> release.
> >
> > The shows will by their very nature need to be "timeless", ie: your
> > topic should still be relevant in four years or more. People will be
> > able to hear the show on the website but they will not be included in
> > any feeds until release.
> >
> > Please begin all shows with text similar to:
> > "This is a backup show, if you are hearing this then HPR needs shows
> > ASAP. Please consider contributing a show. Email admin at hacker public
> > radio dot org for more information."
> >
> > We expect that we need at least 10 shows in the backup queue in order to
> > give people enough time to record and submit shows. Remember once that
> > all the backup shows have been used up and there are no more shows in
> > the queue, HPR as a project will stop.
> > </quote>
>
> I think this makes it clear what to do for non-urgent shows, and how
> that is different from the emergency queue (the new name for which
> also adds some clarity).
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Ken Fallon <k...@fallon.ie> wrote:
> > I think we need to make it clear that shows in this queue will *never*
> > get released unless there is an emergency. The reason I mention 10
> > shows, is because that is the minimum I think we need to rally the
> troops.
> >
> > On the other hand as we can see from the discussions to this thread,
> > some hosts intend that their shows never be rotated out and only used
> > for backup slots.
>
> I think this is the right decision, given the wishes of these hosts.
>
> > So the purpose of this clause is to make the Backup queue an Emergency
> > Queue. IE *only* shows intended to be in there for a looooooong time. No
> > rotation, no maximum size, playable - yes, but not scheduled until they
> > are needed.
> >
> > So what about people that don't care when they are scheduled, who are in
> > no particular rush to have their show aired, but expect it to be
> > released sometime. I do not want to be responsible for scheduling those,
> > for fear of acquisitions of bias. Yes we could write a script to
> > schedule them but then that leads to confusion. So then why not let the
> > people schedule the shows themselves at a time we know will be quiet.
> > Eg: during the summer.
> >
> > Does that seem logical and fair ?
>
> I think this is exactly what's needed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hpr mailing list
> Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org
> http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
>
_______________________________________________
Hpr mailing list
Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org
http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org

Reply via email to