On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Gilles Detillieux wrote: > > #include <ostream.h> > > OK, so should we just make this same change in the source distribution, > or is there a possibility that this will cause problems on other systems? > Do we need configure tests for these header files? I don't think 3.2 > does any, but then 3.2 doesn't have a phenomenal record for portability.
I don't think ensuring full portability in some areas has been at the top of my list for the 3.2 development. That may seem short-sighted, but I'd rather see certain gaping holes fixed (e.g. query parser, mifluz) before going full-bore at the need for additional configure tests. That's beside the point. Unfortunately, the whole *stream.h header issue seems to be a real quagmire on the systems I've seen. IIRC, ostream.h doesn't exist on some platforms, iostream.h doesn't exist on others.... So clearly a simple check for the appropriate header file is needed. I'll add that to the 3.1.6 configure script in a moment. -- -Geoff Hutchison Williams Students Online http://wso.williams.edu/ _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
