On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, brian read wrote: > However if we specify more than one word in the search, then htdig comes > back and shows us the boolean expression that it "uses" using "and" > (which is what we want), however the actual search seems to be "or" not > "and".
Have you tried loading the URL in question in a browser, viewing source, and then searching the source for the missing term (and any of its displayed variations)? htdig of course indexes what the server returns, which might differ from the contents of the named file (e.g. due to SSI or dynamic content). If the file is not HTML, you would probably need to look at the output of the associated parser to see what is happening. It is quite possible that a non-HTML document could contain terms that are not visible when viewing the document directly. Is it at all possible that the document was modified between the time it was indexed and the time you viewed it? The only other thing that comes to mind is database corruption. Has this problem persisted across more than one complete rebuild of your search databases? Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ht://Dig general mailing list: <[email protected]> ht://Dig FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-general
