Geoff Hutchison writes:
>
> The statistic was from _Managing Gigabytes_, but after looking it up
> last night, the correct statistic was "well over 10%" of queries come
> from a list of 1000. I don't know where I got 90% from!
:-) That gives all of us the right to say something wrong on this list.
I'll start by saying that the weather is very cold in St Petersburg.
> While it doesn't give quite the argument for a cache, any attempt for
> high performance will want some sort of query cache. (In addition, we'll
> probably want to support some sort of persistent CGI interface.)
I'd say that the most efficient query cache is probably to have a reverse
proxy. I think squid does this and you can install a set of apache servers
to get the same result.
Cheers,
--
Loic Dachary
ECILA
100 av. du Gal Leclerc
93500 Pantin - France
Tel: 33 1 56 96 09 80, Fax: 33 1 56 96 09 61
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.senga.org/
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.
