According to Geoff Hutchison:
> At 12:26 PM -0700 10/9/99, Joe R. Jah wrote:
> >htdig would only dig the first five keywords in meta tags, disregarding
> >the rest. If set to 0, default, htdig would dig all keywords.
> 
> I think this is fair enough. Unfortunately it's technically after the 
> feature freeze--more on that in a bit.
> 
> This would be a tiny patch. My vote: +1
> (I'm assuming Joe's vote is +1)

+1  - but I'm not volunteering for the job.

This should be a fairly simple addition.  It still leaves the problem
that the first n spam keywords would still flood searches for those
words with the false matches.  You might want to change the semantics
such that if you're over a certain limit, all keywords are ignored.
That could be pretty harsh, though.  What if you set the limit to 8,
but htdig hits a page with 9 perfectly relevant keywords?  The problem
is htdig can't really determine whether the keywords are relevant.
Only human intervention can do that.  This config attribute may help
the problem, but there's no real substitute for a "you spam the index,
you don't get indexed" policy that's strictly enforced.

-- 
Gilles R. Detillieux              E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre       WWW:    http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba  Phone:  (204)789-3766
Winnipeg, MB  R3E 3J7  (Canada)   Fax:    (204)789-3930

------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.

Reply via email to