Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> > I'm just a casual observer here, but I'd say that if you were going to
> > standardize on a single parser, your best bet would be XML. You could
> > probably lift an existing XML parser too. It'd give you a certain
> > degree of future proofing. (I see on the todo list "Field-based
> > searching." XML would be a big step in that direction.)
>
> Yes, if someone could add a good, efficient and reliable XML parser to
> htdig, that would certainly be the way to go.
There are some free XML parsers available from James Clark
http://www.jclark.com/. I don't see any future for meta tags and Dublin
Core. The concept of structured fields or SGML/XML are very important.
-Egon
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'll receive a message confirming the unsubscription.
