On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:22:23 -0600 (CST)
> From: Gilles Detillieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [htdig3-dev] Patch for Ht://Dig v3.1.3
>
> I find this a bit surprising, actually, given that the changes to the
> Could you try applying the patch again, and manually removing the >>
> operator from htString.h and String.cc, and the code that uses in in
> htdig.cc, then testing that out. I'd like to see which of the changes
> is the culprit. If it still fails, perhaps manually back out some of
> the changes to Retriever.cc (and Server.cc).
I divided the patch htdig-3.1.3.diff and placed the fragments in the patch
site. To make them distinct from other patches they all end with ".diff"
Display.cc.diff
DocumentDB.cc.diff
HTML.cc.diff
Retriever.cc-h.diff
Server.cc-h.diff
String.cc.diff
cgi.cc-h.diff
htString.h.diff
htsearch.cc.diff
Retriever.cc-h.diff is the culprit; I backed it off, and everything worked
without a problem.
Regards,
Joe
--
_/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o
_/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_
_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_)
_/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
