> It is actually for the "search_policies" feature, which is probably > redundant due to "allow_in_form". So, once the code for > "search_policies" is stripped away, the above problem will > be irrelevent. Yeah, it's a bit of a moot point as I didn't include the search_policy code when I merged the changes into 3.2. At one point, you said you had some NNTP code for 3.1.x, would you be willing to share? It may not work directly under 3.2, but it would be nice to see it. Thanks, -Geoff ------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You will receive a message to confirm this.
- [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple database (patch) Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple database (patch) Rajendra Inamdar
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple database (patch) Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple database (pat... loic
- [htdig3-dev] Re: substring (was Multipl... Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple database (patch) Rajendra Inamdar
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple database (pat... Gilles Detillieux
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple database ... Rajendra Inamdar
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple data... Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple ... Rajendra Inamdar
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple data... Gilles Detillieux
- Re: [htdig3-dev] Re: Multiple ... Rajendra Inamdar
