On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Sam Tregar wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Philip S Tellis wrote: > > > Just a thought. How about an option for saving the compiled template to > > disk, so that it can be loaded later on. Maybe the new method could > > accept either a raw template or a compiled one, with some Magic Number > > at the start to identify a compiled on, or maybe just an alternate > > parameter. > > > > This would be an advantage because we could then precompile the > > template, thereby getting rid of the initial compile delay. It would > > also be useful in situations where mod_perl isn't being used. > > Ah, yeah, that's how it works. Can you suggest a doc patch that would > make it more clear?
Another thought, any chance to have option to keep the compiled version in database instead of directly to filesystem? I'm always paranoid about having web server the right to write, specially important thing like this. rgd san -- Trabas - http://www.trabas.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
