DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38279>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38279 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-29 14:11 ------- Hi Roland, I am still of an opinion that AsyncHttpProcessor is merely being used as a placeholder for interceptors and does not serve a real purpose in the public API, so probably it should not be a part of public API at all. I still can't help thinking the AbstractHttpDispatcher should derive from the AbstractHttpProcessor and should include all the code of AsyncHttpProcessor. Otherwise I like the API. I still have not looked at the SimpleHttpDispatcher impl in great details. I would like to run a formal vote on inclusion of http-async code into the official project repository as soon as Odi is back from France. This should also trigger a formal vote on your committership Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
