At the very least, there needs to be a 1.4.1 minimum requirement for NIO. (1.4.0 had different behavior for how a selector responds to write interest -- it uses edged-triggered behavior [see: http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html#nb.edge ] on some OS's and level-triggered on others. 1.4.1 made it level-triggered everywhere.)
Sam On 9/29/06, Tatu Saloranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > I have been quietly working on the NIO based client > in HttpCore NIO and > kind of missed java.util.concurrent primitives a lot > in the process of > it. > > How would everyone feel about possibility of using > Java 1.5 for HttpCore > NIO (and possibly HttpAsync as it would also benefit > greatly from using > java.util.concurrent code instead of home brewed > sync primitives)? At this point in time, I would say "go for it". It is new component, and would have clear benefits. -+ Tatu +- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
