> Also before applying the patch I would be interested in a comparison between self-contained levmar and levmar+LAPACK. [...] If there is no improvement of using LAPACK then maybe the LAPACK detection should be removed.
If the benefits of this build-system feature of Hugin are unknown, I agree it is a good idea to remove it. Maybe someone will complain about the removal and provide you with insights on why the option was originally introduced. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Hugin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892420 Title: levmar uses BLAS when built with LAPACK, but Hugin does not link against BLAS Status in Hugin: Incomplete Status in hugin package in Gentoo Linux: Unknown Bug description: ``` hugin-2019.2.0/src/foreign/levmar/misc_core.c:45:#define GEMM LM_MK_BLAS_NAME(gemm) ``` This function is a BLAS function: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Linear_Algebra_Subprograms#Level_3 Thus, since levmar is built as a static library, Hugin itself should call `find_package(BLAS)` and `huginbase` should link against `BLAS_LIBRARIES`. Attached patch fixes this (in an admittedly slightly crude way) for me. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1892420/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~hugin-devs Post to : hugin-devs@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~hugin-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
