trunk, i'd like to test it this afternoon

> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:24:14 -0500
> From: goo...@levy.ch
> To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: vigra 1.6.0 patch
> 
> 
> Thanks, Lukáš!
> 
> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> > But I think it will need more testing before even thinking about
> > moving it to the trunk, because of extensive usage of vigra in hugin
> > so any small regression could cause big problems.
> > I'm calling for anyone to test it.
> 
> For those who want to test it in Ubuntu, this is what I did:
> 
> I followed the instructions at 
> <http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Ubuntu>
> 
> after checking Hugin from SVN and before building it:
> - downloaded the patch to the same folder as hugin's source
> - gunziped it with: gunzip vigra_1.6.0.diff.gz
> - patched it with: patch -p1 < vigra_1.6.0.diff
> - continued building according to the wiki's instructions.
> 
> While this is not much work, still work it is that can be spared. I 
> think the right thing to do is to put it in a repository branch. The 
> question to the team is: which branch?
> 
> Should we branch out a new "vigra1.6" branch and keep trunk for the 
> stable releases? or should we branch out a 0.8 branch and use trunk for 
> the bleeding edge?
> 
> Practically, both solutions are equivalent. The only difference is that 
> trunk is a branch with a policy meaning as it is the natural branch on 
> which most work is focused.
> 
> The choice will give a policy signal.
> 
> I would be inclined to branch out 0.8 for those who do not want to take 
> risks and stick with the past, while including Lukáš's patch in trunk. 
> After all, trunk is meant to be the bleeding edge and a newer, better 
> vigra is just that.
> 
> If trunks proves to have regressions or other instabilities, we can tag 
> and release 0.8.0 from the 0.8 branch. If the tests are positive, we can 
> close the 0.8 branch.
> 
> In both cases there will be a little bit of maintenance work at keeping 
>    changes such as bug fixes in sync. It is more efficient to do it once 
> in SVN and make life easy for everybody else who will just "svn up"; 
> than having everybody maitaining their own patched local install.
> 
> so the question is: trunk, or new branch?
> 
> Yuv
> 
> > 

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_012009
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to