Hi Peter, Peter Gawthrop wrote:
> As far as I know, Fine-Tune is unaware of lens effects. If so, it seem > that the general solution would be to make Fine-Tune aware of the lens > and, for example, map the two small areas used by Fine-Tune to the > centre of the image for processing and then map back again. Indeed, that would be very nice, if the lens parameters (mainly HFOV) are approximately known. An additional least square matching after the correlation search would lead to even better subpixel accuracy for the control points. ciao Pablo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
