Hi all, Great to see that I'm not the only one who likes the idea of a javascript panorama viewer :)
Regarding speed, I've been fiddling around a bit myself with the current version, and here are some of my (mostly quite obvious) findings: - Smaller dimension of input image: faster - Smaller dimension of panorama viewer: faster - Less vertical slices (larger wSlice): faster (but less accurate) - Smaller visible part of the input image (smaller vertical field of view): faster. Compare MODE_PRESSx to MODE_NORMAL or MODE_PANNINI for example. - Google Chrome or Firefox versus Internet Explorer: faster. I've tested the script on my new laptop (Core2 Duo at 2.23 GHz), my 4 year old desktop (Athlon64 at 2.2 GHz) and a pretty recent computer at my job, with the current html file (720x300 pixels). It doesn't run nearly as smooth as most Flash viewers, but 1 or 2 frames per second using IE, and a little more using Chrome and Firefox. Considering it's just Javascript, I found this pretty okay. But of course I hope to get newer versions to run faster. It's open source, so others are of course welcome to contribute. Best, Bart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
