Bruno Postle wrote: > On Tue 28-Apr-2009 at 17:35 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: >> Bruno Postle wrote: >>> does anybody else want to keep the PTBatcher command-line tool? >> Does PTBatcherGUI work on the server as well? without dependencies such >> as wxWidgets? > > Nope, but neither does PTBatcher.
then I don't really care if any or both of them are ditched. A respectable batch processor IMO should live on a server (which in the special case can be the same box as the client) and have a mechanism to accept into the queue projects coming from any client on the network. The GUI, including the GUI controlling the batch queue, can reside on the client. Print spoolers come to my mind. Yuv --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
