2009/6/3 Harry van der Wolf <hvdw...@gmail.com>: > > > 2009/6/3 Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> >> >> On 2009-06-01, Bruno Postle <br...@postle.net> wrote: >> > >> > * hugin will use system lapack if available. Note that this is >> > experimental, you may find that optimisation is slower than before >> > and may even fail. >> >> On my system (OpenBSD) lapack is detected and used if it's installed, >> but we must also link with libm and libblas, otherwise there are >> unresolved symbols, causing linking of celeste_standalone to fail. > > > Same on MacOSX (also in the earlier builds after 3880). I thought it had > something to do with MacOSX being a little different than the linuxes and > BSD's around. > > The cmake version finds lapack, but the build itself doesn't use it. why? > (still MacOSX being a little different?) > The XCode build just "crashed" due to the unresolved dependencies. > As we are trying to release a stable 0.8, I disabled the lapack > functionality for OSX as Hugin has functioned correctly very long without > it. So, I decided to postpone it on OSX after the 0.8 release (and yes, I > know, that was not a democratic decision). That's also why I decided not to > ask Lukas about it as he is busy now with his gsoc project. > > > Hoi, > Harry > > > > >
I'll fix that, but probably not until tomorow. Lukas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
