By the way in the Fast Preview i can also easily see the intersection of the 2 pictures because they don't match perfectly (the horizon is good but in the sky a cloud isn't stitched correctly and same a lot closer on the grass) and there's some visible vignetting. But the blended panorama is just perfect.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 16:12, RizThon <rizt...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm using "Version 2009.1.0.4240 Ad Huikeshoven". > > I just dropped your 2 images in hugin (it automatically chooses "Normal > (rectilinear)", 24mm and 3.43 for the lens info), I automatically added the > control points and clicked the "Stitch now!" button (all default / automatic > values: Rectilinear, FOV 36x20, size 1494x811, "Blended panorama" > checked)and I get a nice blended panorama... > > Here's the pto project: > > # hugin project file > #hugin_ptoversion 2 > p f0 w1494 h811 v36 E14.2408 R0 n"TIFF_m c:NONE r:CROP" > m g1 i0 f0 m2 p0.00784314 > > # image lines > #-hugin cropFactor=3.42522 > i w1600 h1067 f0 Eb1 Eev14.2407913106641 Er1 Ra-0.487184405326843 > Rb-0.656815350055695 Rc0.530101180076599 Rd-0.175079703330994 > Re0.266844481229782 Va1 Vb-0.562101693275359 Vc0.697986748519527 > Vd-0.465450043300806 Vx0 Vy0 a0.00981937612810012 b-0.0242854440807008 > c0.115908411251388 d0 e0 g0 p1.86975840070512 r7.45839605972155e-017 t0 > v24.6992627798865 y-6 Vm5 u10 n"_MG_8888small.jpg" > #-hugin cropFactor=3.42522218289397 > i w1600 h1067 f0 Eb1 Eev14.1310773935208 Er1 Ra=0 Rb=0 Rc=0 Rd=0 Re=0 Va=0 > Vb=0 Vc=0 Vd=0 Vx=0 Vy=0 a=0 b=0 c=0 d=0 e=0 g=0 p1.94688357427167 > r-4.58960554821018e-014 t=0 v=0 y5.3315254049968 Vm5 u10 > n"_MG_8889small.jpg" > > > # specify variables that should be optimized > v p1 r1 y1 > v > > # control points > c n0 N1 x1079.11301 y596.213184 X373.027032 Y602.18922 t0 > c n0 N1 x1220.530422 y599.102304 X515.502063 Y602.735974 t0 > c n0 N1 x1162.478479 y611.132028 X458.413643 Y615.554016 t0 > c n0 N1 x1151.312451 y610.784152 X447.697109 Y615.451378 t0 > c n0 N1 x1156.34132 y624.963225 X452.109932 Y629.637137 t0 > c n0 N1 x1255.329885 y586.293772 X548.894429 Y591.38195 t0 > c n0 N1 x1156.34132 y624.963225 X452.109932 Y629.637137 t0 > c n0 N1 x1293.826983 y536.78735 X583.969347 Y542.337458 t0 > c n0 N1 x1452.982383 y578.174896 X718.702932 Y579.499934 t0 > c n0 N1 x1000.783409 y539.74238 X288.310223 Y543.714683 t0 > c n0 N1 x1184.090007 y599.721106 X480.139624 Y603.590377 t0 > c n0 N1 x1508.872868 y617.994293 X762.222422 Y613.007973 t0 > c n0 N1 x1493.373942 y613.081415 X749.654938 Y609.450382 t0 > c n0 N1 x1255.329885 y586.293772 X548.894429 Y591.38195 t0 > c n0 N1 x922.505554 y584.044079 X197.687794 Y591.935524 t0 > c n0 N1 x1000.783409 y539.74238 X288.310223 Y543.714683 t0 > c n0 N1 x946.718196 y584.221199 X224.062558 Y592.061588 t0 > c n0 N1 x1097.636405 y556.367918 X393.459208 Y561.809487 t0 > c n0 N1 x1481.369191 y624.845392 X738.565614 Y620.145061 t0 > c n0 N1 x1554.910862 y629.042134 X795.170011 Y622.561956 t0 > > #hugin_optimizeReferenceImage 0 > #hugin_blender enblend > #hugin_remapper nona > #hugin_enblendOptions > #hugin_enfuseOptions > #hugin_hdrmergeOptions > #hugin_outputLDRBlended true > #hugin_outputLDRLayers false > #hugin_outputLDRExposureRemapped false > #hugin_outputLDRExposureLayers false > #hugin_outputLDRExposureBlended false > #hugin_outputHDRBlended false > #hugin_outputHDRLayers false > #hugin_outputHDRStacks false > #hugin_outputLayersCompression PACKBITS > #hugin_outputImageType jpg > #hugin_outputImageTypeCompression NONE > #hugin_outputJPEGQuality 80 > #hugin_outputImageTypeHDR exr > #hugin_outputImageTypeHDRCompression > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 15:09, don <don...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> So as I said, I'm using WinXP SP3. I tried downloading (probably) the >> latest version (0.8.0.3943 Ad Huikeshoven), which was said to work on >> Vista. I chose default installation, run Hugin.exe, loaded images, >> pressed Align, it started looking for control points but in the end it >> didn't find any (previous versions did).I addded the control points >> manually and then did some exposure optimalization - the end result >> was nearly OK, but still I think that PS CS4 produced it slighly >> better. But because I'm too lazy to add control points manually, I >> went back to the last fully working version (0.8.0.3943 Ad >> Huikeshoven), did the same (except adding control points manully - the >> assistant took care of this), then did the optimalization (low dynamic >> range)...and the end result was bad again. I believe I must be doing >> something very wrong, because this seems like incredibly easy task and >> I'd swear that few years back it would have worked for me in Hugin >> without any problems. >> >> Daniel, my panorama preview looks nothing like yours - I can clearly >> see the stitches in mine. It is not that bad in Fast Preview Panorama >> as it is in Preview Panorama (what is the difference?) though. >> >> If any of you would like to try and have a go with the photos, I've >> uploaded them here: >> http://don.vn.cz/temp/repo/hugin/_MG_8888small.jpg >> http://don.vn.cz/temp/repo/hugin/_MG_8889small.jpg >> >> thanks guys. >> >> On 10 říj, 03:56, dkloi <dkl...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > On 9 Oct, 14:24, don <don...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks for the advice. I tried fiddling with the settings in EXPOSURES >> > > tab, but that didn't give me any good result. The source photos are >> > > JPEGs, straight from camera, both shot at 1/160 f11 @ ISO 100. To me >> > > it seems like Hugin is doing some kind of exposure optimisation which >> > > is not really necessary, hence the strange result. Perhaps it's worth >> > > mentioning that I'm using the stitch assistent - I choose the two >> > > photos from my hard drive, press ALIGN and when Hugin shows me >> > > Panorama preview, it already looks strange ( >> http://don.vn.cz/temp/repo/ >> > > hugin/huginpreview.jpg) >> > >> > What exactly did you fiddle with in the exposure tab? Try selecting >> > Low Dynamic Range, or Low Dynamic Range with Variable White balance, >> > and then optimise. Preview the stitch, the images should overlap >> > pretty well even without blending. >> > >> > Example Pre-Exposure Optimisationhttp:// >> cnqo.phys.strath.ac.uk/~daniel/Photos/Examples/AlignImages.jpg<http://cnqo.phys.strath.ac.uk/%7Edaniel/Photos/Examples/AlignImages.jpg> >> > Example Post-Exposure Optimisation, no blendinghttp:// >> cnqo.phys.strath.ac.uk/~daniel/Photos/Examples/NotBlended.jpg<http://cnqo.phys.strath.ac.uk/%7Edaniel/Photos/Examples/NotBlended.jpg> >> > >> > You camera could be doing some processing to the image prior to >> > writing out the JPEG which could be the source of your problem. Make >> > sure the EV numbers are the same for both images in the Camera and >> > Lens tab. Hugin uses the EV numbers to calculate the relative >> > brightness of the images. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Daniel. >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
