Am Sonntag 08 November 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy: > Bruno Postle wrote: > > The default image cache size is very small (75 MB I think), 17 five > > megapixel photos will result in churn with images being reloaded. > > > > Hmm the wiki says it is 200MB. Either value is too low for any > > modern system, this number should be revisited. > > it seems that the default value is a fixed constant in a header file. > Easy to change, but to which value? IIRC there are occasional reports of > crashes because of an excessively high value. Is there a C / C++ > function to determine how much memory is available? > how about making it > a % of this? how would this account for swap memory on Linux?
Don't know, if this would help. I had to set this limit 200MB.
But making a small program here shows me, that this limit has
nothing to do with real available memory.
It was able to allocate up to 2GB of memory in _one_ chunk.
> > The straighten function doesn't use control points, which is why the
> > vertical points were ignored - It should probably do something
> > different (or even nothing at all) when there are vertical or
> > horizontal control points.
>
> does anybody find that function useful? I never use it.
I use it. It is very handy for a first visual improvement after optimizing,
when there are no
vertical or horizontal control points.
> Yuv
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
