They both use the same transformation code (libpano). PTmender is simply a transformation program. It does not do anything else (you need other tools to do other tasks, such as masking, compositing, etc). I consider it to be the testbed for new code that goes into libpano.
Nona is more refined and is capable of outputting different formats. PTmender is, I presume, 4-5 times faster than nona. --dmg On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Jeffrey Martin <360cit...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was under the impression that Nona is better. > > Are they equivalent, or is one superior? Or does it depend on what you want > to do? > > thanks, > Jeffrey > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- --dmg --- Daniel M. German http://turingmachine.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
