If you need the speed, and are willing to deal with TIFF output only, then yes. Otherwise still to nona.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Jeffrey Martin <360cit...@gmail.com> wrote: > If PTMender is 4-5 times faster than Nona, and you use it only for remapping > "normal" images (no stacking, hdr, etc.) then it seems there is no reason to > use Nona? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- --dmg --- Daniel M. German http://turingmachine.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
