Is there any update on this issue?



On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Sigma Relief <jkru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am glad this is a common issue and it looks like there are lots of
> ideas.  I like the proposed dynamic area that automatically shows all
> selected photos, but it should be an option, not a replacement for the
> context of seeing where in the sequence images lie.
>
> Allowing the user to adjust the height of the tab section and thus
> control how many lines are displayed would solve the how many to show
> dilemma.
>
> While on this topic, a more direct way to find a specific image would
> be useful.  Many CAD systems let users right click through a stacked
> layer of parts to select hidden objects.  A similar right click option
> to cycle thru stacked photos, identify the number of a selected photo,
> and perhaps most importantly, allow editing of some sort would be
> great.
>
> Being able to directly remove a selected image from the project via
> the preview pane once selected, either thru the tab at top or a new
> right click option is a good first start to weed out bad images.
>
> Allowing masks to be drawn in preview will allow much greater
> continuity and speed for tweeking multi row images.  Being able to
> crop all the moving heads from the upper row of a pano shot in a crowd
> quickly would be nice.  Same goes for moving clouds between rows.
> There would obviously need to be some method of selecting which image
> or images to apply masks to.
>
> Adding control points would be another obvious feature to add to the
> preview tool once images can be directly selected.  A zoom function
> would make placement a lot more accurate.  The current scroll wheel
> field of view change(when they are selected) is mostly useless as is
> is not used often and the manual slider is much more accurate when
> needed.  I'm sure zooming is a heavy set of computations, but resizing
> the window works like a charm, I don't see why this should be that
> different.
>
> An even more exotic control point feature would be an auto find
> feature that takes a user selected point on 1 image and searches
> nearby areas in all stacked photos for similar points.  A dynamic
> threshold that starts lower than normal (after all, these points were
> probably not found in the origional search) and increases based on the
> angular distance (not pixel distance) from the chosen point.  I have
> found selecting the exact same point on stacked photos, especially
> architectural ones with hard lines helps mediocre alignment projects,
> but gets time consuming when 5 or more images stack. It is these
> heavily overlapped corners that such a feature helps with most by
> getting everything to converge on 1 point.
>
> Being able to see control points that only tie to a single image could
> help root out bad images as the current implementation gets
> overwhelmed in large projects.  A feature to sort by worst average
> control point distance for an entire image would also point out
> trouble images better than the worst pairs list in the control points
> tab.
>
> Well that got a bit out of hand, I hope I don't kill a good thread.  I
> know feature requests are a dime a dozen, but the new fast preview is
> so good in my opinion that it deserves a spot in the creation chain,
> not just to check results.
>
> On Jan 13, 8:21 am, kevin <ke...@bluelavalamp.net> wrote:
> > On Jan 13, 3:36 am, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I sympathize. In complex multi-sequence situations with large numbers
> > > of images, trying to identify images by looking at 'which number
> > > lights up' (or reverse) is a pain, since often the numbers for the
> > > image one wants to identify are outside the currently displayed range.
> > > This has often annoyed me. But where does one draw a line? 100 images?
> > > 200? two rows? three? maybe there's a better way altogether?
> >
> > > Kay
> >
> > > On 13 Jan., 05:54, Sigma Relief <jkru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Just a minor request for the GUI on the fast preview feature in
> > > > windows; make the numbered tabs closer together when there are more
> > > > images.  The old version could fit 50+ on a 1600 pixel wide screen
> > > > while fast preview fits 40 with large spacing between tabs.  Reducing
> > > > spacing would be a good easy start.  Wrapping to a 2nd or 3rd line
> > > > would make identifying images easier as it eliminates having to
> > > > continually scroll back and forth when using the identify feature.
>  At
> > > > least in Windows, there is plenty of room for 3 rows of numbers, 1
> > > > above the current row and 1 where the horizontal scroll bar is.  A
> > > > small vertical scroll bar could be used for more than 3 rows.
> >
> > > > Are there any simple variables a user could tweak to improve this?
> >
> > > > I'm not sure if there is an official feature request area so any
> > > > pointers would be appreciated.
> >
> > What about in addition to the row with the scroll bar there's a line
> > where the numbers change.  If there's no mouse on an image the area is
> > blank, when the mouse moves over images that area is used to show
> > which image numbers are currently highlighted and they can be colored
> > just like the scrolled row is.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
> To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<hugin-ptx%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
>



-- 


*Emaad*
www.flickr.com/emaad

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to