On Tue 01-Mar-2011 at 02:33 -0800, Kay F. Jahnke wrote:
So I made the test and made a single-image pto and put a 125-point mask on the image manually, just to be sure it wasn't some strange effect of my script. It took nona over 11 seconds to render the image. when I removed the mask, it only took 4.4 seconds. This was with a 12MP 16bit TIFF in stereographic projection, on Pre-Release 2010.5.0.a11acbf8be1d. I wonder if anyone else has noticed this? Has it been like this all along? Maybe I'm the only one using masks with more than a couple of dozen points?
I've noticed that lots of masks slows down the preview, but everything generally works ok for the original intent of rough masks manually created in the GUI.
Clearly your generated masks are pushing the limits, it would be nice to resolve these issues at some point, this should be a bug report.
-- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
