On Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:25:51 PM UTC+1, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > Only one calculation delivered one match less (floating point accuracy?) >
Floating point accuracy will be exactly the same for consecutive runs (unless your processor is physically broken), so this cannot be the issue. I haven't looked at the algorithms used (or the source code at all), but if RANSAC (random sampling consensus) is used, the differences can be caused by different seeds for the randomizer. Note that in this case it isn't really a bug, although it may seem strange. RANSAC needs randomization. The results would be the same every time if the "random" values used by RANSAC were more or less static (e.g. same initial seed instead of based on the computer clock) which would solve this apparent issue. But this is a mere guess. -- Bart -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
