Hello Mark,
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:37:56 +1100, Terry Duell <[email protected]>
wrote:
Don't give up. There will be an answer to this, and probably a simple
one.
Hugin is (usually) very nicely behaved.
I'll have a look at a couple of your images.
I tried stitching your 0007 and 0008.tif in hugin-2013.1.0 (development
source) and they stitched OK using your .pto, but the result, when
displayed in "Gimp" (I think Gimp actually opened the image up in UFRaw)
looks very similar to what you showed. "Shotwell" also displayed the
result very poorly.
The result does display OK in "image viewer" (fedora), and "Darktable".
Your input images are 16 bit, and you have output set for tif in your
.pto, which means output is also 16 bit. The viewers which show the stitch
poorly cannot, or do not, handle 16 bit correctly.
If you set your output to jpeg (in the stitcher tab), you will get an 8
bit result (if that is OK for your purposes), and every image viewer
should display it OK.
It looks to me as though hugin is doing it's job correctly.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.w53rr5oars0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
