Hello Robert,
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:07:49 +1000, Robert Krawitz <r...@alum.mit.edu>
wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:34:31 +1000, Terry Duell wrote:
[snip]
OK. Can you provide a .pto from a very early stage, i.e. prior to doing
any refinement, say just after generating control points for all images
and no optimisation steps performed?
Here it is. I presume that control point generation is deterministic.
Using this .pto (almanor-16-bad-1.pto), if I deselect images
1,3,5,7,9,11,12 I can then optimise everything without all hell breaking
loose. I optimised in steps, positions, positions and view, positions and
barrel, positions view and barrel, then everything. Are you able to
reproduce this behaviour?
Whilst this might not be an acceptable workaround for you, the mean error
is 3.1 pix, max 12.4, it is still considered a good fit.
It doesn't solve the basic problem, but maybe adds a bit more info to help
track down the cause.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.xj44izjyrs0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
