Some comments ...
- Reducing your image set to three exposures is a Good Thing (tm).
- Option ` --exposure-cutoff' looks promising.
... and ideas
- Switch off saturation weighting with `--saturation-weight=0'. This may
or may not
help, but certainly will make the effects of exposure weigthing obvious.
- Play with the `--exposure-optimum' option, especially with values less
then .5.
- Let Enfuse write its masks with `--save-masks', then inspect the mask
images
whether they reflect _your_ intended pixel weights.
Last resort: Supply me with _small_ (~ 1500x1000 pixels) versions of your
images
and I'll have a look at your problem.
HTH,
Chris (the one who collected all the equations and graphs;)
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/3224b21d-d846-4969-b021-432b954806ef%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
