On 26 September 2016 10:17:22 BST, Bernd D wrote: > >Of course, this is not an error in cpfind. cpfind results can only be as >accurate as the input data. Without --fullscale, the accuracy is at least >halved. That may be acceptable. But I have total failures seen in the >absence of this option, which resulted that hugin run more than 3 hours on >a 25x25 mosaic of images with 1000x1000pix (Overlap approx 150pix). The >pictures were taken on a scanning electron microscope.
This is a special case, Hugin has to assume that most input images are photos taken with Bayer sensors that have higher pixel resolution than necessary. I haven't tested this, but it is also possible that downsizing the pictures removes high frequency artefacts that would confuse the feature detector (leading to better results for digital photos). -- Bruno -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/15BE88EA-6BF8-4CAC-ABF3-5EE3017EBD1A%40postle.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
