Unless I'm missing some geometrical effect, it doesn't seem to me that you would have to re-optimize it given that the transformation should precisely preserve the panorama's sewing just like in the animation above, so as I understand it, control point distances should only change proportionally to the scale you apply. But correct me if I'm wrong.
As for getting it right in the first place, in my use case, I have to superimpose a panorama to its virtual 3D environment in Blender and I need sub-degree precision on the HFOV. I don't think any software could make such a precise guess with the photos I get from my clients. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/AHvsZyI5Wx27kf1WFPPIjhqVWtT-sVUZXGLhengFjT3dQ2bgr4CKPNF3aZsyAZFwPGoHi-yyWgfX8MH88iCp6wCh0IZIdMk2_OCwN9U2eeM%3D%40protonmail.com.
