If you set the weight of a control point to a value W, the geometrical 
optimizer treats it like if there were instead W control points at the same 
position (if W in an integer). However W needs not to integer. If no weight 
is given, a weight of 1 is assumed.

If for some reason the stitching yields visible striking errors at a 
position, you could force the error to get smaller by increasing the 
weights of CPs near this position. However, the errors at other positions 
will increase more or less. If you unfortunately increase the weight of a 
CP that is bad positioned (on moving objects or due to not corrected errors 
from lens distortion) this will lead to much more visual defects at other 
positions. So you could e.g. set the weight set to 4 in order to make the 
error smaller at this position, but setting it to 100 could be problematic.

I have a large panorama where I took the photos with a relative small angle 
of view (tele photo). On some CPs on the trunk of a tree I set the weight 
to 100, but on some photos are only small branches or leafs of trees, and 
these CP have weights of 1. On some photos I didn't have another choice but 
using CPs on clouds, and I set their weights smaller than 1, e.g. 0.1.
gunter.ko...@gmail.com schrieb am Montag, 9. Mai 2022 um 21:09:30 UTC+2:

> Two possible reasons I can think of: If you place 100 control points very 
> near to each other they will count more than a few control points at the 
> edges caused by their sheer number.
>
> ...and if the lens distortion isn't modeled accurately for your lens there 
> is a high probability that the middle of the lens can be matched better 
> than the edges of the viewport.
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/97a42b38-66ef-47d2-9ba7-3048303056d9n%40googlegroups.com.
  • [hugin-ptx] Co... 'Michael Perry' via hugin and other free panoramic software
    • [hugin-pt... Florian Königstein
      • [hugi... 'Michael Perry' via hugin and other free panoramic software
        • R... Gunter Königsmann
          • ... Florian Königstein
          • ... Klaus Foehl

Reply via email to