> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:hum-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Trev
>
>
> The new police radio in the UK uses channel hopping Geoff.
> That's not the same as commercial radio/TV.
And what do you imagine are the implications of channel-hopping regarding
quantities of RF ?
> Even the users don't like the RF safety aspect from what I've read.
There is a general fear of RF devices about the person now due to awareness
re cell-phone studies. But not necessarily an 'informed' fear. In general
the RF output of personal transceivers can now be far lower than it has
been for the last 60 years for the same range. And it is hugely lower for
cell-phones.
I do know a little about this sort of thing, it (the repair and testing of
radio gear) having been part of my job for years. Personally I prefer to
avoid using my cell-phone unnecessarily, and always extend the antenna when
I can. But that is the cell-phone itself, nothing to do with the towers. I
would avoid staying within say 20 metres of a primary tower site for hours
on end.
geoff
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
