Two factors here..frequency and power levels. I do get discomfort from mobiles operated in car where the car acts as a cavity and power levels also rise to get out of the screen of metal. Geoff..you do then agree that under certain circs uWaves can be bad for humans then? It's just a matter of conditions. Shouldn't we know them then? Where are they quantified anywhwere? All we get is thermal effects which are assumed to be minimal anyway. I think this is also what limits safety levels at close up situations on aerials etc.
On the LF pulse issue, as in Tetra -I wonder if the eyes- as fluid filled and connected to the brain directly in nerve tissues-- aren't supremely vulnerable to this type of entry. I saw the Somerset report and it does seem alarming, the question of auto suggestion comes in- but better to err on the side of caution. Are the permitters of these builds ever likely to live close by? I've said before 'Nimby' is alive and well and everywhere- especially in Quangoland UK Inc.! On Feb 5, 1:00 pm, [email protected] wrote: > ..................not Sweden - Somerset.....knew it began with an > 'S'............. > > http://www.thetelecom.co.uk/20090105/wi-fi-town-reports-widespread-he... > > .....and some more authoritative research here............ > > http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-n... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
