Something else I meant to mention in the SA file ,apart from the repetitive freq spread (indicating either some possible aliasing or even artifact in the source), is that the 'cut offs' of the fundamental are limits of what many people report as Hum.
Mine , at the low end of 27 Hz, and upper- at 80 Hz, as the usual max of others where it tangles (intermodulates?) with mains supply freq. causing the annoying beat 'throb', that wears so. This is shown as the wide yellow band at the base of the the spectrum. Yes!, wideband, repetitive and suspiciously clean- all in all, coupled with the unique measurement technique makes this more than a chance occurence. What are your thoughts John? On Jun 17, 11:39 pm, Pete <[email protected]> wrote: > I've got my computer output wired up to a NAD amplifier with some good > bass responsive Acoustic Research loudspeakers out putting the sound. > So, if the volume is turned right down until I just about hear this > MP3, and the imagine it's in my head rather than coming from the > speakers, then it's pretty damn close. If it went up and down randomly > as it does, or as it does as I perceive it, then it'd be spot on. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
