BTW, on this O/P I made,  - no response?
Maybe not enough techies to help explain why there is so much sub 20Hz
activity comparable, with not many dBs down on the mains background,
which peak is well understood.
Quite likely they are Schumann sidebands for all I know- but they're
quite capable of intermodulation with other ELF activities and could
easily account for much, if maybe not all, the HuMmmmmm,,,,,

On Aug 7, 12:16 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've posted there but not much response.
> They do seem to just chat around the issues with those endless
> duplications of posts- must waste loads of GBytes. Much like here,
> except no dupes.
> On the subject, I notice Geoff gets little support and irritates quite
> a few on there.
> Always persistent, I have to be really doubtful about his independence
> of opinion.
> I find some angles quite interesting on there, but with the format not
> as easy as here, I don't get involved.
> Recent talk of dog seizures were interesting -as one two doors down
> from me in UK  (12 y.o) had sudden ear troubles, had it taken out
> completely - then died of a siezure a coupla weeks ago a week after
> the op... :(
> The family moved in 3-4 yrs  ago.
> On Aug 7, 5:20 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >   That hum forum is not seeking the truth.  Anything that goes outside
> > of the
> > box of a specific view, you get booted off that Yahoo hum site.  You
> > can bet
> > Geoff will be a life long member.  Got to keep the masses thinking in
> > the
> > direction you want them to think.
>
> >   But's just my opinion of my experience with that site.
>
> > On Jun 30, 11:13 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > This is of interest showing a clear 64 Hz line, 50 Hz background mains
> > > (Europe) and what always interests me- a high ELF earth resonance
> > > increasing below 20 Hz and showing in red at the lower portion of the
> > > graphhttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/humforum/message/11354
> > > (I can't post the imageshack link on here for some reason)
> > > There was very little analysis (unusual for the site) but it's good to
> > > see people are getting used to flagging up specifics on their own
> > > volition- and records like this will hopefully grow in time- becoming
> > > the standard fare for Humz discussions rather than subjective comments
> > > from far and wide.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to