I am glad that I got that off my chest, even if I am (maybe) just spitting in the wind! -------------------------------------------------------------- Greenhorn3K AKA M.R. in Brandon (near Tampa) Florida.
On Sep 4, 12:27 am, Sandstorm <[email protected]> wrote: > (I repeated this as a reply to my detailed post, because it is > apparently a very unusual event, at least from my vantage point, so > forgive the redundancy, it may be relevant to a lot of people, and I > want everyone here to read it!) > (and I have also posted it at Yahoo´s hum group, so you can read > different responses there. > My username is Greenhorn3K on yahoo.) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I just posted my detailed analysis (yesterday) of the sound I heard, I > heard the hum as usual this evening not really paying attention, then > it hit me, IT CHANGED BACK TO THE NORTHERN ANNOYING (to put it very > mildly) SOURCE! > (Tonight I measured it at about 20 degrees (North-Northwest), from my > home, which isn't exactly the direction, but as I said, the trees/ > terrain can play havoc with these low frequency sounds!) > > So...here are the possibilities: > 1) I am crazy (I just threw that out there, because, after we are > basically "brains in vats". Look it up.) > 2)I am not crazy, and I am hearing/feeling some VERY LOUD low > frequency events. (The frequency is very low, but the sound is very > loud. It just happens to be outside the average person's range of > hearing.) > > If I am not crazy: > 2a)The sound just randomly changed back, and has nothing to do with my > post. > 2b)The sound was changed back in direct response to my post. > > If the sound changed back in direct response to my post: > 2aa)I was right in my analysis, and they realize that it can be heard > (by a certain % of the population) and someone doesn't want the > attention. > (For the record, I don't care, I just want peace and quiet, if it > means light in the darkness, so be it!) > 2ab)I was right in my analysis, and they realize that it can be heard > (by a certain % of the population) but for whatever OTHER reason, they > changed it back. > > I am sure I didn't "exhaust" all the possibilities, but I am > "exhausted"! > > If 2aa) is right, then, sorry guys, you should have done more remote > testing before implementing new technology/whatever in population > centers. > > (But the thing I don't understand is, there is still unwanted > attention, that is, I can still hear it!!) > Cue Twilight Zone music... > > (Simple solution guys, turn off that crap, back to the drawing board!) > (Write off your investment on your taxes, see, that is win/win!) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
