By co incidence today a read an article where the technology is being used to cure- So it MUST have an effect, good or ill. http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/161581/Migraine-Machine-that-can-zap-the-pain
On Mar 4, 7:28 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > The more I read and re-read about Microwave Auditory Effects and the > Neurological effects that have been studied, the more I get use to the > terminology , the more I am convinced that the auditory effect that > they side lined as not hazardous back in 1991 and then again in 2005 > grouping all sensory perception of EMF as not a hazardous effect. I > am sure that if they will take another look at the effects caused in > the brain when the hum is present they will see all the other areas > effected by the waves going thru the brain. The restless leg > syndrome, Fybromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue, ADD. > > Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation by > Henry Lai, his Vienna Paper from 1998; gave clues to the reason for > passivity. > I got a copy from http://www.mapcruzin.com/radiofrequency/henry_lai2.htm > In this paper he further explains and updates the terminology from > where Frey left off. > The effects and affect of the opiates and dopimines being stimulated > in the brain is enough to change anyones behavior. > Suspicion: I was in my local Big Box department store, they are now > playing music with the pure tones incorporated, do you think that this > could persuade people to spend more than they had intended to. I > think so, the tones seem to have an neurological response, dopamine > release that we can not control. > Thanks for hanging in > Patty > > On Mar 3, 2:14 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I don't see your post as a rant at all. > > One of the most worrying things I note today is the passivity and > > acceptance by people of the PTB as the new 'God Head' in their lives. > > People should be angry, both at what is happening to their planet > > [never mind G Warming- that is a side issue of the rip off] and also > > at the personal affront that spacial highjacking presents via effects > > like EM pollution. > > That guy in Sweden [uWave effects] has been pushing for ages- but they > > seem like voices in the dark- as people are IN the dark- and can't > > bear the light much, as it's all a bit scary ! > > We're supposed to trust our leaders, scientists and medicos after all. > > Oops!... > > > On Mar 2, 8:23 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi everybody; I don't use a cellphone, I don't even use a microwave. > > > I refused jobs in the past because I'd have to wear earphones. I > > > could never stand being around such things let alone having them stuck > > > in my ears. The reasons I have for reading the documents let me see > > > the conjecture that has been used to protect this industry. Now they > > > are in a corner, I'm glad I'm not in thier shoes, but if I was, I'd be > > > honest. > > > It is effecting everyone, I think very few are immune to it. It just > > > has such varying degrees and hits on different weakness in each > > > individual. The different frequencies and thier modulations all have > > > different catagories of effects. More studys have been done on near > > > field, which has a different effect from far fields. > > > Have they been sneaky in the way that they state thier case? Have > > > they used arrogance? To keep people in the dark, suffering quietly. > > > I keep seeing them as the Ostrich with it's proverbial head stuck in > > > the sand. > > > The microwaves not only go thru the skulls of hum hearers but they go > > > thru the skulls of everyone. If you don't have the unseen spectrum of > > > light waves going thru your head, if you don't percieve them you have > > > no sensory transduction, I'm sure they call that being brain dead. > > > > Sorry I have to rant sometimes too. > > > Patty > > > > On Feb 25, 11:29 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > you are absolutely right about the waves going thru the brain Well > > > > they are > > > > about to introduce new even faster wireless > > > > technology to the public Odds are we are already living within it > > > > and it > > > > probably affects us whether we are carrying a wireless device or not > > > > > WHO isn't confused They know exactly what they are doing which is > > > > influencing public opinion to think how TPTB want the population to > > > > think > > > > wireless technology is of > > > > no harm no foul play > > > > > On Feb 25, 11:10 am, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > No I don't trust them. My truth is that we all are human. I am > > > > > reading the articles so I can see the short comings in the processes > > > > > they are using. > > > > > We do have a comprehensive case. They are confused, probably more > > > > > than we are. One chink in thier armour that I notice is, how they are > > > > > equating the effects of the use of a cell phone (near field) with the > > > > > effects of base stations (far field). They are flipping from one to > > > > > the other. I must say the EMF sensitives in Europe have put a ruffle > > > > > in their feathers. I know how I felt when I was first confronted with > > > > > the truth of this matter. The disblief that this monster has been > > > > > allowed to grow so large, and how can it be stopped. Peoples minds > > > > > are effected by the waves, so I have to work with the factor, that I > > > > > must forgive them (to an extent) because they too are under the > > > > > influence. > > > > > So I look for information in the reports that they provide. Yes I am > > > > > reading between the lines. I believe in the microwave auditory > > > > > effect, I feel the effects on my nervous system, it scares me. > > > > > I am trying to keep a tight control on my anger, anger is a bundle of > > > > > emotions. How many times in my life so far have I been dissuated, > > > > > because the one I have asked for help has said it's too complicated, > > > > > usually what I have found out later is that they didn't have the > > > > > answer in the first place. > > > > > They may be experts in the scientific community but they are only part > > > > > of what makes the world. They might be singing, but anyone with any > > > > > insight can see the waves going thru the brain and figure that the > > > > > brain is not a void, even the effects on neural synpse, neural synapse > > > > > are roughly nanometres apart, would they not be effected in the wave. > > > > > I never though I would have to think about such things. > > > > > Thank you for responding, I don't have anyone to talk to about this. > > > > > My husband gets a glazed look on his face when I ponder the situation > > > > > out loud. > > > > > Patty > > > > > On Feb 24, 10:28 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yes but sometimes rants about how complicated subjects happen to > > > > > > be > > > > > > just another form of avoiding the issue and reaching conclusions > > > > > > WHO's job is to > > > > > > interfer with reaching conclusions, complicated or not Yes I would > > > > > > assume they give some insights, but basically it is up to us to read > > > > > > between the lines because WHO is NEVER going to tell us the whole > > > > > > truth because they would lose their non profit funding and the top > > > > > > people would lose their easy ride > > > > > > > And just as I suspected, considering the link you provided, WHO > > > > > > is > > > > > > singing > > > > > > like a canary to protect the industry it is suppose to be studying > > > > > > for > > > > > > ill > > > > > > health effects Notice how they so eloquently keep the conversation > > > > > > about > > > > > > RF levels Not all wireless is RF And not all wireless is > > > > > > modulation > > > > > > of RF > > > > > > > THE BOLD BASIC TRUTH IS BRAIN TUMORS, CANCERS IN MEN N WOMEN, > > > > > > DIABETIES, CENTRAL NERVOUS > > > > > > SYSTEM DISORDERS, ADD TYPE DISORDERS, OBSESSIVE DISORDERS, > > > > > > CHRONIC INSOMIA, CHRONIC FATIQUE TYPE DISORDERS, BIRTH DEFECTS AND > > > > > > STILL BIRTHS, BREATHING PROBLEMS (Asthma), AS WELL AS > > > > > > TOO LARGE OF A PORTION OF THE POPULATION IS LEANING TOWARDS > > > > > > ROAD RAGES OR THE EXTREME OF GOING POSTAL > > > > > > > Something in our environments are inducing our bodies to go > > > > > > through > > > > > > these > > > > > > multiple changes of our immune systems not being able to do the job > > > > > > it use to > > > > > > > Radiation and magnetic fields fill this bill more than any other > > > > > > form of > > > > > > technology advancement and that points at the advancement of > > > > > > wireless > > > > > > > WHO can pretend from now until Doomsday, but pretending is what > > > > > > they > > > > > > are doing WHO knows perfectly well where there money comes from > > > > > > and > > > > > > they have the brains to not bite the hand that feeds them even with > > > > > > despite unavoidable uncertainty to deal with I notice they also go > > > > > > out of > > > > > > their way to not link our 60 Hz grid or European's 50 Hz grid to not > > > > > > be > > > > > > considered part of the equation when it is a very large part of the > > > > > > equation > > > > > > > As summarized here, these separate avenues of scientific > > > > > > investigation > > > > > > provide little support for adverse health effects arising from RF > > > > > > exposure at levels below current international standards. Moreover, > > > > > > radio and television broadcast waves have exposed populations to RF > > > > > > for > 50 years with little evidence of deleterious health > > > > > > consequences. Despite unavoidable uncertainty, current scientific > > > > > > data > > > > > > are consistent with the conclusion that public exposures to > > > > > > permissible RF levels from mobile telephony and base stations are > > > > > > not > > > > > > likely to adversely affect human health. > > > > > > > Radiofrequency (RF) waves have long been used for different types of > > > > > > information exchange via the airwaves—wireless Morse code, radio, > > > > > > television, and wireless telephony (i.e., construction and operation > > > > > > of telephones or telephonic systems) . Increasingly larger numbers > > > > > > of > > > > > > people rely on mobile telephone technology, and health concerns > > > > > > about > > > > > > the associated RF exposure have been raised, particularly because > > > > > > the > > > > > > mobile phone handset operates in close proximity to the human body, > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
