Hi dboots; I agree the IEEE has known about the health hazards, or should I say have accumulated research documents that have studied mice, rats, monkeys and humans but with studies at near field ( oh I forgot the cell studies in the labs). But have denied those suffering in far field situations. I wonder if they had a secret panel watching the news articles to see what the public was saying about the effects they were feeling and as I know hearing. I read documents along the way that talked about how to handle the public and thier perceptions. I read the describtions as to the meaning of health hazard, thier meaning anyway. My summation, we have been unjustly ignored, my suffering and pain is real. The personal space in my head is being trespassed on, if I could move away from it, or ignore it , I would. If I though it was right to just try to ignore it, I would. But I don't think that, that is the right thing to do. Not only is this the biggest environmental experiment ever produced but it is also the most insidious trespass that has ever occurred. In thier special supplement of 2003, (Review of Effects of RF Fields on Various Aspects of Human Health: Introduction, by C-K. Chou and J.A D'Andrea) They may have a general concensus of 12 working commandments a new declaration to work under ( I especially dislike the 7th (the microwave hearing effect is not adverse and should not be used for setting the peak power limit.). This was a new declaration ignoring special safety limits set in the beginning of this technology. They may have Twelve but I have Ten. I thank you dboots for giving me this oppurtunity to talk about a bug that has been bothering me. I don't know electricy or the technology , or the math but I do know, that if you increase the dosage of anything it does change the effect. Barely Hangin in Patty
On May 4, 3:27 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > No the IEEE knows it is a health hazard but buts thats the party line > they are taking Got to protect the wireless industry along with > governments information technology thrust thru satellite technology's > > On May 3, 12:08 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi dboots; > > What I had read was that the outer hair cells are the most sensitive, > > critically tuned, to respond. Running loose with though here. > > at least the Hum is percieved as a sound, eyes responding to this > > sort of pulsed electromagnetics (I think) only respond with floaters, > > abnormal, and quite irradicate, I think I read it was the rods that > > are the most likely to be effected. > > I know it's strange even the pineal gland responds to light whether we > > have our eyes open or not. > > I believe that the other sensory pathways also respond to the > > electromagnetics - our earthly environment. > > I only wish that the IEEE, though so too, then they wouldn't have said > > that ( no quote here) that sensory perception of the pulsed or > > amplitude modulation and percieved effects is not a health hazard. > > Just doing my best to live with the pain. > > Sufferer > > Patty > > > On May 1, 5:27 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Patty I am unsure of what point u r trying to make because our > > > retina is also capable of responding to pulsed electromagnetics as > > > well as our other sensory pathways Pulsed electromagnetics like > > > infrasound emitting a silent sound of vibration energy can affect > > > other human sensory modalities beyond auditory > > > > So I am unsure what you were trying to express here concerning the > > > cochlea > > > > But thanks and take care yourself > > > > On Apr 28, 2:56 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi dboots; The cochlea is the only human organism capable of > > > > responding to the pulsed electromagnetics. > > > > Thanks and take care > > > > Patty > > > > > On Apr 24, 9:02 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Soumyajit Mandal, who designed the chip to mimic the cochlea, which > > > > > uses fluid mechanics, piezoelectrics and neural signal processing to > > > > > convert sound waves into electrical signals that are sent to the > > > > > brain. > > > > > "The cochlea quickly gets the big picture of what is going on in the > > > > > sound spectrum," said Sarpeshkar. "The more I started to look at the > > > > > ear, the more I realized it's like a super radio with 3,500 parallel > > > > > channels > > > > > >http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/rss/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=2177... > > > > > > Researchers tout RF chip that mimics the inner ear > > > > > > John Walko > > > > > EE Times Europe > > > > > (06/04/2009 8:13 AM EDT) > > > > > > LONDON — Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology > > > > > (MIT) have developed a fast, low-power radio chip imitating the human > > > > > inner ear, or cochlea. > > > > > > The radiofrequency chip RF cochlea (in article encrytion squares > > > > > around RF cochlea) > > > > > is capable of picking up mobile phone, GPS, radio, internet and > > > > > Bluetooth signals and, the researchers suggest, could enable wireless > > > > > devices to receive cell phone, wireless Internet, FM radio and other > > > > > signals. > > > > > According to the engineers, the RF cochlea chip is faster than any > > > > > human-designed radio-frequency spectrum analyzer and also operates at > > > > > a lower power. > > > > > The MIT team was led by Rahul Sarpeshkar, associate professor of > > > > > electrical engineering and computer science, and his graduate student, > > > > > Soumyajit Mandal, who designed the chip to mimic the cochlea, which > > > > > uses fluid mechanics, piezoelectrics and neural signal processing to > > > > > convert sound waves into electrical signals that are sent to the > > > > > brain. > > > > > "The cochlea quickly gets the big picture of what is going on in the > > > > > sound spectrum," said Sarpeshkar. "The more I started to look at the > > > > > ear, the more I realized it's like a super radio with 3,500 parallel > > > > > channels." > > > > > The RF cochlea, embedded on a silicon chip measuring 1.5mm by 3mm, > > > > > detects the composition of any electromagnetic waves within its > > > > > perception range. > > > > > It'is said to consume about 100 times less power than that required > > > > > for direct digitization of the entire bandwidth, the researchers say. > > > > > They suggest this makes it desirable as a component of a cognitive > > > > > radio, which could receive a broad range of frequencies. > > > > > Sarpeshkar and his students describe the device in a paper to be > > > > > published in the June issue of the IEEE Journal of Solid-State > > > > > Circuits . They have also filed for a patent to incorporate the RF > > > > > cochlea in a software radio architecture that is designed to > > > > > efficiently process a broad spectrum of signals. > > > > > The paper notes that as sound waves enter the cochlea, they create > > > > > mechanical waves in the cochlear membrane and the fluid of the inner > > > > > ear, activating hair cells (cells that cause electrical signals to be > > > > > sent to the brain). > > > > > The cochlea can perceive a 100-fold range of frequencies -- in humans, > > > > > from 100 to 10,000 Hz. Sarpeshkar used the same design principles in > > > > > the RF cochlea to create a device that can perceive signals at > > > > > million- > > > > > fold higher frequencies, which includes radio signals for most > > > > > commercial wireless applications. > > > > > This is not the first time Sarpeshkar has drawn on biology for > > > > > inspiration in designing electronic devices. His MIT group previously > > > > > developed an analogue speech-synthesis chip inspired by the human > > > > > vocal tract and an analysis-by-synthesis technique based on the vocal > > > > > tract. The chip's potential for speech recognition and voice > > > > > identification has applications in portable devices and security > > > > > applications. > > > > > He is also working on projects inspired by signal processing in cells, > > > > > and has worked on hybrid analogue-digital signal processors inspired > > > > > by neurons in the human brain. > > > > > "Humans have a long way to go before their architectures will > > > > > successfully compete with those in nature, especially in situations > > > > > where ultra-energy-efficient or ultra-low-power operation are > > > > > paramount," Sarpeshkar said. > > > > > Reference : Mandal, S.; Zhak, S. M.; Sarpeshkar, R. A Bio-Inspired > > > > > Active Radio-Frequency Silicon Cochlea. IEEE Journal of Solid-State > > > > > Circuits, 2009; 44 (6): 1814-1828 DOI: > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]. > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.-Hidequotedtext - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Hum Sufferers" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.-Hidequoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Hum Sufferers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hum Sufferers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
