Propaganda machines In the US's late 90's wireless non thermal energy studies, they specifically instructed how those working under grants were suppose to handle public inquiry's while they were out in the field by being non-invasive of fact they were collecting data concerning radiation from towers,masts, n cell ph's
Perhaps we are the human data of that mass study that is instead on going instead of supposely completed If wireless energy is the energy your governments foresee to run our homes and businesses, then they have to be more than aware they are creating a harshier environment for all living species Perhaps future generations, their DNA is gonna need some extra strengthening to withstand this harshier environment Yes I agree if you increase the dosage or output of something it is going to have to have effects on the public Most probably the wireless technology does more harm than good even in it non thermal/ non ionizing capacity Profit comes first nevermind the future unhealth of the population globally due to cell mutation because of microwave frequencys Many studies are labeling it EM sensentivity or EM hypersensitivity I think wireless technologys are intricately tied into our noise that we suffer Glad you feel free to talk about something you felt was bothering you http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18366821?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed In case link redirects you here is data so you can find link on your own if you want Psychol Med. 2008 Dec;38(12):1781-91. Epub 2008 Mar 26. Cognitive and neurobiological alterations in electromagnetic hypersensitive patients: results of a case-control study. Landgrebe M, Frick U, Hauser S, Langguth B, Rosner R, Hajak G, Eichhammer P. Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EMF) is frequently claimed to be linked to a variety of non-specific somatic and neuropsychological complaints. Whereas provocation studies often failed to demonstrate a causal relationship between EMF exposure and symptom formation, recent studies point to a complex interplay of neurophysiological and cognitive alterations contributing to symptom manifestation in electromagnetic hypersensitive patients (EHS). However, these studies have examined only small sample sizes or have focused on selected aspects. Therefore this study examined in the largest sample of EHS EMF-specific cognitive correlates, discrimination ability and neurobiological parameters in order to get further insight into the pathophysiology of electromagnetic hypersensitivity. METHOD: In a case-control design 89 EHS and 107 age- and gender-matched controls were included in the study. Health status and EMF-specific cognitions were evaluated using standardized questionnaires. Perception thresholds following single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were determined using a standardized blinded measurement protocol. Cortical excitability parameters were measured by TMS. RESULTS: Discrimination ability was significantly reduced in EHS (only 40% of the EHS but 60% of the controls felt no sensation under sham stimulation during the complete series), whereas the perception thresholds for real magnetic pulses were comparable in both groups (median 21% versus 24% of maximum pulse intensity). Intra-cortical facilitation was decreased in younger and increased in older EHS. In addition, typical EMF-related cognitions (aspects of rumination, symptom intolerance, vulnerability and stabilizing self-esteem) specifically differentiated EHS from their controls. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate significant cognitive and neurobiological alterations pointing to a higher genuine individual vulnerability of electromagnetic hypersensitive patients. On May 5, 11:19 am, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi dboots; I agree the IEEE has known about the health hazards, or > should I say have accumulated research documents that have studied > mice, rats, monkeys and humans but with studies at near field ( oh I > forgot the cell studies in the labs). But have denied those suffering > in far field situations. I wonder if they had a secret panel watching > the news articles to see what the public was saying about the effects > they were feeling and as I know hearing. I read documents along the > way that talked about how to handle the public and thier perceptions. > I read the describtions as to the meaning of health hazard, thier > meaning anyway. My summation, we have been unjustly ignored, my > suffering and pain is real. The personal space in my head is being > trespassed on, if I could move away from it, or ignore it , I would. > If I though it was right to just try to ignore it, I would. But I > don't think that, that is the right thing to do. > Not only is this the biggest environmental experiment ever produced > but it is also the most insidious trespass that has ever occurred. > In thier special supplement of 2003, (Review of Effects of RF Fields > on Various Aspects of Human Health: Introduction, by C-K. Chou and > J.A D'Andrea) They may have a general concensus of 12 working > commandments a new declaration to work under ( I especially dislike > the 7th (the microwave hearing effect is not adverse and should not be > used for setting the peak power limit.). > This was a new declaration ignoring special safety limits set in the > beginning of this technology. > They may have Twelve but I have Ten. > I thank you dboots for giving me this oppurtunity to talk about a bug > that has been bothering me. > I don't know electricy or the technology , or the math but I do know, > that if you increase the dosage of anything it does change the effect. > Barely Hangin in > Patty > > On May 4, 3:27 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > No the IEEE knows it is a health hazard but buts thats the party line > > they are taking Got to protect the wireless industry along with > > governments information technology thrust thru satellite technology's > > > On May 3, 12:08 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi dboots; > > > What I had read was that the outer hair cells are the most sensitive, > > > critically tuned, to respond. Running loose with though here. > > > at least the Hum is percieved as a sound, eyes responding to this > > > sort of pulsed electromagnetics (I think) only respond with floaters, > > > abnormal, and quite irradicate, I think I read it was the rods that > > > are the most likely to be effected. > > > I know it's strange even the pineal gland responds to light whether we > > > have our eyes open or not. > > > I believe that the other sensory pathways also respond to the > > > electromagnetics - our earthly environment. > > > I only wish that the IEEE, though so too, then they wouldn't have said > > > that ( no quote here) that sensory perception of the pulsed or > > > amplitude modulation and percieved effects is not a health hazard. > > > Just doing my best to live with the pain. > > > Sufferer > > > Patty > > > > On May 1, 5:27 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Patty I am unsure of what point u r trying to make because our > > > > retina is also capable of responding to pulsed electromagnetics as > > > > well as our other sensory pathways Pulsed electromagnetics like > > > > infrasound emitting a silent sound of vibration energy can affect > > > > other human sensory modalities beyond auditory > > > > > So I am unsure what you were trying to express here concerning the > > > > cochlea > > > > > But thanks and take care yourself > > > > > On Apr 28, 2:56 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi dboots; The cochlea is the only human organism capable of > > > > > responding to the pulsed electromagnetics. > > > > > Thanks and take care > > > > > Patty > > > > > > On Apr 24, 9:02 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Soumyajit Mandal, who designed the chip to mimic the cochlea, which > > > > > > uses fluid mechanics, piezoelectrics and neural signal processing to > > > > > > convert sound waves into electrical signals that are sent to the > > > > > > brain. > > > > > > "The cochlea quickly gets the big picture of what is going on in the > > > > > > sound spectrum," said Sarpeshkar. "The more I started to look at the > > > > > > ear, the more I realized it's like a super radio with 3,500 parallel > > > > > > channels > > > > > > >http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/rss/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=2177... > > > > > > > Researchers tout RF chip that mimics the inner ear > > > > > > > John Walko > > > > > > EE Times Europe > > > > > > (06/04/2009 8:13 AM EDT) > > > > > > > LONDON — Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology > > > > > > (MIT) have developed a fast, low-power radio chip imitating the > > > > > > human > > > > > > inner ear, or cochlea. > > > > > > > The radiofrequency chip RF cochlea (in article encrytion squares > > > > > > around RF cochlea) > > > > > > is capable of picking up mobile phone, GPS, radio, internet and > > > > > > Bluetooth signals and, the researchers suggest, could enable > > > > > > wireless > > > > > > devices to receive cell phone, wireless Internet, FM radio and other > > > > > > signals. > > > > > > According to the engineers, the RF cochlea chip is faster than any > > > > > > human-designed radio-frequency spectrum analyzer and also operates > > > > > > at > > > > > > a lower power. > > > > > > The MIT team was led by Rahul Sarpeshkar, associate professor of > > > > > > electrical engineering and computer science, and his graduate > > > > > > student, > > > > > > Soumyajit Mandal, who designed the chip to mimic the cochlea, which > > > > > > uses fluid mechanics, piezoelectrics and neural signal processing to > > > > > > convert sound waves into electrical signals that are sent to the > > > > > > brain. > > > > > > "The cochlea quickly gets the big picture of what is going on in the > > > > > > sound spectrum," said Sarpeshkar. "The more I started to look at the > > > > > > ear, the more I realized it's like a super radio with 3,500 parallel > > > > > > channels." > > > > > > The RF cochlea, embedded on a silicon chip measuring 1.5mm by 3mm, > > > > > > detects the composition of any electromagnetic waves within its > > > > > > perception range. > > > > > > It'is said to consume about 100 times less power than that required > > > > > > for direct digitization of the entire bandwidth, the researchers > > > > > > say. > > > > > > They suggest this makes it desirable as a component of a cognitive > > > > > > radio, which could receive a broad range of frequencies. > > > > > > Sarpeshkar and his students describe the device in a paper to be > > > > > > published in the June issue of the IEEE Journal of Solid-State > > > > > > Circuits . They have also filed for a patent to incorporate the RF > > > > > > cochlea in a software radio architecture that is designed to > > > > > > efficiently process a broad spectrum of signals. > > > > > > The paper notes that as sound waves enter the cochlea, they create > > > > > > mechanical waves in the cochlear membrane and the fluid of the inner > > > > > > ear, activating hair cells (cells that cause electrical signals to > > > > > > be > > > > > > sent to the brain). > > > > > > The cochlea can perceive a 100-fold range of frequencies -- in > > > > > > humans, > > > > > > from 100 to 10,000 Hz. Sarpeshkar used the same design principles in > > > > > > the RF cochlea to create a device that can perceive signals at > > > > > > million- > > > > > > fold higher frequencies, which includes radio signals for most > > > > > > commercial wireless applications. > > > > > > This is not the first time Sarpeshkar has drawn on biology for > > > > > > inspiration in designing electronic devices. His MIT group > > > > > > previously > > > > > > developed an analogue speech-synthesis chip inspired by the human > > > > > > vocal tract and an analysis-by-synthesis technique based on the > > > > > > vocal > > > > > > tract. The chip's potential for speech recognition and voice > > > > > > identification has applications in portable devices and security > > > > > > applications. > > > > > > He is also working on projects inspired by signal processing in > > > > > > cells, > > > > > > and has worked on hybrid analogue-digital signal processors inspired > > > > > > by neurons in the human brain. > > > > > > "Humans have a long way to go before their architectures will > > > > > > successfully compete with those in nature, especially in situations > > > > > > where ultra-energy-efficient or ultra-low-power operation are > > > > > > paramount," Sarpeshkar said. > > > > > > Reference : Mandal, S.; Zhak, S. M.; Sarpeshkar, R. A Bio-Inspired > > > > > > Active Radio-Frequency Silicon Cochlea. IEEE Journal of Solid-State > > > > > > Circuits, 2009; 44 (6): 1814-1828 DOI: > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > > Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.-Hidequotedtext- > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
