Hi dboots; After all the reading on this subject the articles on DNA still send my head reeling. >From what articles I could partially understand though and a section that was included on our Spectrum Management site, they did state that it took a realtively short exposure at high intensities to cloud the cornea of a rabbit. They later realized that the picture of the rabbits lens being clouded was too telling and removed it from the website. >From my perspective, the interaction with DNA could be very telling. I saw a program where they showed the extraction of strands of DNA, a solution and vibration then, the strands are left to be observed and read. Why should it be so difficult to understand that we react on a cellular level to the unseen spectrum of light, we exist in it. I've just realized the extent of Satellite Systems and the enormity of the spectrum that has been invaded. Could the Satellites over the poles be helping in melting the ice? Patty
On Jun 9, 9:30 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > The goal of this study was to investigate whether superposing of > electromagnetic noise could block or attenuate DNA damage and > intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) increase of cultured > human > lens epithelial cells (HLECs) induced by acute exposure to 1.8 GHz > radiofrequency field (RF) of the Global System for Mobile > Communications (GSM). METHODS > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18509546 > > Mol Vis. 2008 May 19;14:964-9. > > Electromagnetic noise inhibits radiofrequency radiation-induced DNA > damage and reactive oxygen species increase in human lens epithelial > cells. > Yao K, Wu W, Wang K, Ni S, Ye P, Yu Y, Ye J, Sun L. > > Eye Center, Affiliated Second Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang > University, Hangzhou,China. [email protected] > > Abstract > PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate whether superposing > of electromagnetic noise could block or attenuate DNA damage and > intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) increase of cultured > human > lens epithelial cells (HLECs) induced by acute exposure to 1.8 GHz > radiofrequency field (RF) of the Global System for Mobile > Communications (GSM). METHODS: An sXc-1800 RF exposure system was used > to produce a GSM signal at 1.8 GHz (217 Hz amplitude-modulated) with > the specific absorption rate (SAR) of 1, 2, 3, and 4 W/kg. After 2 h > of intermittent exposure, the ROS level was assessed by the > fluorescent probe, 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH- > DA). DNA damage to HLECs was examined by alkaline comet assay and the > phosphorylated form of histone variant H2AX (gammaH2AX) foci > formation > assay. > > RESULTS: After exposure to 1.8 GHz RF for 2 h, HLECs exhibited > significant intracellular ROS increase in the 2, 3, and 4 W/kg > groups. > RF radiation at the SAR of 3 W/kg and 4 W/kg could induce significant > DNA damage, examined by alkaline comet assay, which was used to detect > mainly single strand breaks (SSBs), while no statistical difference in > double strand breaks (DSBs), evaluated by gammaH2AX foci, was found > between RF exposure (SAR: 3 and 4 W/kg) and sham exposure groups. > > When RF was superposed with 2 muT electromagnetic noise could block > RF-induced ROS increase and DNA damage. > > CONCLUSIONS: DNA damage induced > by 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field for 2 h, which was mainly SSBs, may be > associated with the increased ROS production. > > Electromagnetic noise could block RF-induced ROS formation and DNA > damage -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
