Note this comment on the article.. "Through glass, submarine hulls... maybe through Faraday cages" - Hum is certainly no respecter of these !
There's some interesting comments, mostly conventional, views on the topic at their forum - http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2010/07/19/submarine_tech_hints_at_clandestine_surveillance/ This shows that there's a lot of interest in the technique[s] but very limited thinking when it really comes down to it. Good to see that the fringe is getting closer to our discussions on possible Hum mechanisms, even though it has to be borne in mind that Dis-Info is always on the cards. Look at how 'Geo Engineering' is now being discussed in academia/ establishment as if it hasn't been going on [with CTs] for decades. Thinking outside the box can indeed be difficult if the 'box' itself is a manipulated illusion :) Hum is a somewhat rarified phenomena and doesn't get on the radar well enough to highlight leakage round the edges of our box! On Aug 24, 10:57 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting Thanks for posting this Trev > > On Aug 21, 11:13 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Here's an interesting report showing how far science has moved on. I > > wonder if the word 'scalar' ever crops up in > > discussions?http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/19/submarine_tech_hints_at_cland... > > Makes humming rather staid, really!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
