That refusal to release the document on electrical effects contributing to Hum tells a a lot. It would be good to know the reasons so I'll have a sniff around. The trouble is double negatives type data aren't really helpful and the report is needed and should be released forthwith. If people over there in the US can't get it no one else will, for sure.
On Mar 24, 9:30 am, "john dawes" <[email protected]> wrote: > In 1993 the US Government commissioned an official enquirery into the Hum > which became known as the Taos Hum Investigation. > > Scientists from two renowned national laboratories and universities, using > the best available equipment, conducted an in-depth investigation lasting two > years. > > The investigation was conducted in two parts, the first was concerned with > acoustic noise and vibration, the second part concentrated on electrical > effects. > > With the conclusion of the investigation two official reports were prepared, > part one, which contained the results of the acoustic and vibration > observations was published and made available for public scrutiny. The second > report which contained measurements of electrical effects was not published, > this report was classified as restricted and not available for public > scrutiny. > > Since the Taos Investigation several US citizens have attempted to see this > second report using the US Freedom of Information Act but their requests were > refused.. To my knowledge the second report is still classified and not > available to the public. > > It is most probable that the second report does indicate the source of the > Hum and its implications regarding human health. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
