Unless our problem here is totally different than everyone else's they don't seem to get what's needed to track this down. You can't simply measure this crap for the purpose of "an indentifiable give away", you have to do area wide (25 mile range minium) testing and plot date and evalute where the highest level of ILFN frequency intensities are. Ours is measurable,but unless you have a bench mark to measure against the quantitative data is not important. It is the change and the location of the highest SPL's that ID the location.
maybe my fresh new idea is tough to swallow for many... I'm refering to the article which is intersting becasue I have given Leventhall the background to this theory - thanks On Jun 13, 2:53 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve- I see an unread flag but nothing new that I can see -your post > now is the latest and does not refer to my content?? > Who's wasting whos time here? > I was going to post this anyway...http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-13752688 > Now THAT'S news :) > > On Jun 11, 8:17 pm, Steve K <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Trev, is there a quick way to see in the more recent topics, an > > indication that you have an unread comment awaiting. Time consuming > > opening each topic everytime to check. And with all the sites I am > > monitoring it's taking allot of time. > > Thank > > Steve > > > On Jun 11, 12:14 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
